Ottomans |
Safavids |
Ottoman
Leadership:
Despite the
world-changing liberation of Istanbul by the Turks in
1453, the reign of Suleyman I (or Suleiman I) the
Magnificent (r. 1520-1566) marked the peak of Ottoman
grandeur. Upon his ascension in 1520 he began his reign
with campaigns against the Christian powers in central
Europe and the Mediterranean. Belgrade, the island of
Rhodes and Hungary all fell to the Ottomans within 6
years, however, they were defeated after a multinational
European force stopped the Ottoman advance at Vienna in
1529. He annexed much of the Middle East in his conflict
with the Safavids and large areas of North Africa as far
west as Algeria. Under his rule, the Ottoman fleet
dominated the seas from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea
and through the Persian Gulf.
Suleyman
was known as the ‘Lawgiver’ in his realm because he
issued a series of non-Islamic laws to help harmonize
social life within the Ottoman Empire. His proponents
suggest he was different from his predecessors because
he was a man of the pen as well as of the sword. During
his reign, Suleiman ensured that Shariah law was
practiced uniformly across the Empire by legal
assistants and experts. Suleyman and many experts went
through the judgment of his nine predecessors,
eliminated duplications, and contradictory statements
and created a single uniform legal code which remained
within the laws of Islam. Also known as the Ottoman
Laws, this code lasted for over three centuries.
Suleyman
sough to reduce the levels of corruption within his
multiethnic Empire, and he even passed laws that made it
illegal to be discriminatory against the Empire’s
Christian subjects. However, Suleyman had a dark side as
well. One of Suleyman’s sons, Selim II, succeeded him,
but only after Suleyman had ordered one of his sons to
be strangled to death (1553), another one executed
(1561), along with the execution of four other sons
after a rebellion.
However,
Suleyman, tired of the campaigns and arduous duties of
administration withdrew from public affairs, leading the
office of grand vizier to
become second only to the sultan in authority and revenue.
The grand vizier’s authority included the right to demand
and obtain absolute obedience. But, while the grand vizier
was able to stand in for the sultan in official functions,
he could not take his place as the focus of loyalty for
all the different classes and groups in the empire.
|
Safavid
Leadership:
Early Safavid
power in Iran was based on the military power of the
Qizilbash, a coalition of many different tribes of
predominantly (but not exclusively) Turkic-speaking
background united in their adherence to Shia Islam. Some
Hindu elements in the belief of reincarnation
syncretized into the heterodox beliefs among the Turkmen
tribes, causing the Qizilbash to view their Safavid
leader (“the Perfect Guide") as the reincarnation of Ali
and a manifestation of the divine in human form.
Shah
Abbas I, also known as Abbas the Great (r. 1588-1629),
was arguably the greatest of all Safavid leaders.
Abbas
was a great builder and moved his kingdom's capital from
Qazvin to Isfahan, making the city the pinnacle of
Safavid architecture. Under Abbas, Isfahan became a
social crossroads where European and Indian traders,
travelers and adventurers mixed with many levels of
Safavid society. Shah 'Abbas saw the rulers of Christian
Europe as potential military allies against his enemies,
the Ottomans, as well as commercial partners. Luxury
Iranian silk was exchanged for gold and silver, which
was in short supply in Iran but plentiful in Europe
thanks to new supplies from South America. He was
tolerant of Europeans and encouraged them to come to
Iran. Catholic priests, representatives of the Dutch and
British East India Companies and European ambassadors
all mixed in the cosmopolitan society of Isfahan.
Shah
Abbas had three sons that survived past their childhood
and were all potential heirs to the throne. Abbas
believed rumors that his eldest son was conspiring
against him, so he had him killed. After falling
seriously ill in 1621, the next son, believing his
father was on his death bed, began celebrating. Abbas
recovered, had the son blinded (disqualifying him from
becoming Shah), and had him imprisoned. The third son
started on good terms with Abbas, but later the Shah had
him blinded and imprisoned as well. Succession to the
throne eventually went to one of Abbas’ grandsons.
|
Military and
Conquest:
The
Ottomans, a Sunni dynasty, considered the
active recruitment of Turkmen tribes of Anatolia for the
Safavid cause as a major threat. In 1514,
Sultan Selim I marched through Anatolia and
met the Safavid army, leading to the decisive Battle of
Chaldiran. Most sources agree that the Ottoman army was
at least double the size of that of the
Safavids, however, what gave the Ottomans the
advantage was the use of guns and artillery, which the
Safavid army lacked.
By the
end of Suleiman's reign, the Empire spanned
approximately 877,888 sq mi, extending over
three continents. In addition, the Empire became a
dominant naval force, controlling much of the
Mediterranean Sea. The Ottomans were holders of the
Caliph title, meaning they were the leaders of all
Muslims worldwide. The Iberians were leaders of the
Christian crusaders, and so the two were locked in a
worldwide conflict. For instance, the Ottomans sent
armies to aid its easternmost vassal and territory, the
Sultanate of Aceh in Southeast Asia. During the 1600s,
the worldwide conflict between the Ottoman Caliphate and
Iberian Union was a stalemate since both powers were at
similar population, technology and economic levels.
|
Military and Conquest:
Under Shah Abbās
I (r. 1588-1629), the army underwent significant reform.
Three bodies of troops were formed, paid out of the
royal treasury: the ghulāms (slaves), the tofangchīs
(musketeers), and the topchīs (artillerymen).
With this new army, Abbās defeated the Turks in 1603,
forcing them to relinquish all the territory they had
seized prevoiusly, and captured Baghdad. He also
expelled (1602, 1622) the Portuguese traders who had
seized the island of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf early in
the 16th century.
The
Safavids raised Persia to the status of a great power.
Trade with the West and industry expanded,
communications improved. Abbas moved the capital to
Isfahan and made it the center of Safavid architectural
achievement, manifest in several notable mosques and
monuments. Despite the Safavid Shia zeal, Christians
were tolerated, and several missions and churches were
built.
Abbas I
was the first ruler to establish a significant corps of
musketeers and a separate corps of artillery, which were
relatively effective but were always outnumbered by
masses of cavalry armed with lances, swords, and bows.
|
Society:
The
basic division in Ottoman society was the traditional
Middle Eastern distinction between a small ruling class
of Ottomans (Osmanl) and a
large mass of subjects called rayas. Three
attributes were essential for membership in the Ottoman
ruling class: profession of loyalty to the sultan and
his state; acceptance and practice of Islam, and
adherence to the customs, behavior, and language known
as the Ottoman Way. Those
who lacked any of those attributes were considered to be
rayas (the subject class), the “protected flock” of the
sultan.
Rayas
could potentially rise into the ruling class, and
Ottomans could fall into the subject class. Members of
the ruling class were considered the sultan’s slaves,
and their properties, lives, and persons were entirely
at his disposition. Their basic functions were to
preserve the Islamic nature of the state and to rule and
defend the empire. By Ottoman theory the main attribute
of the sultan’s sovereignty
was the right to possess and exploit all sources of
wealth in the empire. The function of enlarging,
protecting, and exploiting that wealth for the benefit
of the sultan and his state, therefore, was the main
duty of the ruling class. The rayas produced the wealth
by farming the land or engaging in trade and industry
and then paying a portion of the resulting profits to
the ruling class in the form of taxes.
The
basic class divisions within the subject class were
determined by religion, with each important group
organizing into a relatively self-contained autonomous
religious community usually called a millet (also taife
or cemaat), which operated under its own laws
and customs and was directed by a religious leader
responsible to the sultan for the fulfillment of the
duties and responsibilities of the millet
members, particularly those of paying taxes and
security. In addition, each millet cared for
the many social and administrative functions not assumed
by the Ottoman ruling class, concerning such matters as
marriage, divorce, birth and death, health, education,
internal security, and justice. The purpose of the millet
system was to keep the different peoples of the empire
separated in order to minimize conflict and preserve
social order in a highly heterogeneous state.
Devshirme was the Ottoman practice of
forcibly recruiting soldiers and bureaucrats from among
the children of their Balkan Christian subjects. Ottoman soldiers would take
European Christian males, aged 8 to 20 - often forcibly
- and relocate them to Istanbul, where they would be
trained. The devshirme was often resented by locals
though some Christian families volunteered their sons,
as service offered good career options. The boys were
given a formal education, and trained in science,
warfare and bureaucratic administration, and became
advisers to the sultan, elite infantry, generals in the
army, admirals in the navy, and bureaucrats working on
finance in the Ottoman Empire.
|
Society:
Safavid
society could be considered a meritocracy,
meaning a society in which officials were appointed on
the basis of worth and merit, and not on the basis of
birth. It was certainly not an oligarchy, nor was it an
aristocracy. Sons of nobles were considered for the
succession of their fathers as a mark of respect, but
they had to prove themselves worthy of the position.
This system avoided an entrenched aristocracy or a caste
society. There even are numerous recorded accounts of
laymen that rose to high official posts, as a result of
their merits.
Nevertheless,
the Iranian society during the Safavids was that of a
hierarchy, with the Shah at the apex of the hierarchical
pyramid, the common people, merchants and peasants at
the base, and the aristocrats in between. Safavid
society was composed mostly of rural villagers as well
as nomadic pastoralists and an urban elite. The Shi’i
clergy or mullahs also held considerable power,
particularly over the largely illiterate peasantry, who
looked to the clergy for religious and political
guidance.
Many
mullahs were large landowners and used the revenues from
their property to provide independent financing for
religious schools and foundations. Thus, when the
central authority in Persia was weak, the mullahs often
became a political force in their own right.
Safavid rulers were dependent on taxations and revenues
from vast Crown or state land and often used land to
reward loyal officers and bureaucratic officials. Under
Abbas I, the Crown also had a state monopoly over the
sale of silk and encouraged a lively trade with western
European powers as well as with Russia.
|
Role
of Women:
Women's
social life was often one of relative seclusion, as was
common in many cultures at the time. However, the type
of seclusion changed, sometimes drastically, depending
on class. Urban women lived in some amount of sex
segregation during most of the empire's history, as many
social gatherings were segregated, and many upper-class
urban women veiled in public areas.
The
Sultanate of Women occurred between 1533 and 1656,
beginning with the reign of Suleyman the Magnificent.
These sultanas were either the wives of the Sultan, or
the mothers of the Sultan. Many of these women were of
slave origins, as was expected of the sultanate, since
traditional marriage roles were considered too large a
risk for the Sultan, who was expected to have no
personal allegiances outside his title. During this
time, sultanas held political and social power, which
allowed them to influence the daily running of the
empire, as well as requesting the construction of
buildings (e.g., mosques), and philanthropic works.
Even
with a direct connection to the sultan, many sultanas
often faced opposition from the viziers of the sultan,
as well as from public opinion. Where their male
predecessors had won favor with the public through
military conquest and charisma, female leaders had to
rely on imperial ceremonies and the construction of
monuments and public works.
|
Role
of Women:
There were distinct types of women in Safavid Iran: the
married wives of upper-class men, those living in more
rural and communal settlements, those engaged in arts
and crafts and industrial activities within towns and
cities, those who contracted temporary marriages, slaves
of both sexes, and prostitutes. Women married to elites
especially were more secluded in their households and
were required to be veiled out in public. However, at
some times and in some places within the Persian Empire,
some women did resist wearing face coverings, played
important roles in politics, and engaged in trade and
moneylending.
Virtually
all marriages were arranged, organized by parents, with
the bride’s family offering a dowry (gifts to the
groom’s family). Lifelong celibacy, especially for men,
was considered as unnatural and unacceptable. Girls were
supposed to maintain their virginity until their wedding
night; however, males were encouraged to experience sex
at their earliest practical age.
Divorce
was available to both the male and the female, and
remarriage was relatively easy. "If a husband repudiated
his wife he was obliged to return her dowry, but if it
was the wife who sued for divorce she forfeited it"
(Ferrier, p388).
Some
women born of more common or lowly status acquired power
and wealth through prostitution, whose activities also
included singing and dancing. Regarding art, male and
female space were often distinguished, whether separated
by tents or buildings. Thus women are portrayed, but
placed in a space separate from that of the men.
|
Culture:
The legal and customary bases of organization and action
for the Ottomans depended on a dual system of law:
Shariah, the Muslim religious law, and the kanun,
or civil law. Shariah, based heavily on the Qu’ran and
early Muslim tradition, was the basic law of Ottoman
society, as it was of all Muslim communities. For the
Ottomans, it never was developed in detail in matters of
public law, state organization, and administration. Its
general principles left room for interpretation and
legislation on specific matters by secular authorities,
and the Muslim judges of the Ottoman Empire recognized
the right of the sultan to legislate in civil laws as
long as he did not conflict with Shariah in detail or
principle. Shariah, therefore, provided the principles
of public law and covered matters of personal behavior
and status in the Muslim millets in the same
way that the members of the Christian and Jewish millets
were subject to their own religious codes. The members
of the ulama who interpreted the law in the courts had
the right to invalidate any secular law they felt
contradicted Shariah; however, they rarely used that
right, because, as part of the ruling class, they were
under the authority of the sultan
and
could be removed from their positions.
Several
anthropology experts state that the reign of Suleyman
was a cultural Golden Age because there were
improvements in every field of the Arts; notable
improvement came in the areas of calligraphy, textiles,
ceramics, and manuscript painting. The Sultan ensured
that hundreds of artistic societies came to Topkapi
Palace in the Empire’s capital. As early as 1526, there
were 40 societies with over 600 members, and this number
only grew over time.
|
Culture:
By the
early 16th century, Safavid leaders declared
Shi’ism as the state religion, despite having been
largely Sunni from its inception.
Following
his conquest of Persia, Ismail I made conversion
mandatory for the largely Sunni population.
The Sunni Ulema - or clergy - were either
killed or exiled. Ismail I, brought in Shi’a religious
leaders and granted them land and money in return for
loyalty.
Abbas’
tolerance towards Christians was part of his policy of
establishing diplomatic links with European powers to
try to enlist their help in the fight against their
common enemy, the Ottoman Empire.
The shah
eagerly sought an alliance with Spain, the chief
opponent of the Ottomans in Europe. Abbas offered
trading rights and the chance to preach Christianity in
Persia in return for help against the Ottomans. However,
despite some minor agreements, Abbas’ overtures produced
relatively little in terms of a meaningful alliance.
Safavid
Persia was very multicultural as a pivotal location
along the Silk and Sea Roads. Chinese influence was seen
in many ways, including syncretism in the arts. Chinese
as well as Safavid artisans blended their own styles
with regard to metalworking, painting, calligraphy,
glass and tile work, and pottery.
Shah
'Abbas’s reign was a golden age for the arts in Iran.
Abbas understood the power of a single message and was
keen to imprint a visual style on his empire. He
employed calligraphers, painters, bookbinders and
illuminators to produce manuscripts and design
inscriptions and paintings for buildings. Carpets of
silk and gold, calligraphy and the portraiture all
embody the period of Shah 'Abbas I.
|